|
The legislative history of the Controlled Substances Act
instructs that:
"if a drug creates no danger to the public health, it
would be inappropriate to control the drug under this bill."(1)
As discussed above, teenage marijuana use is an indicator
of the effectiveness of public policy and law, not an indicator
of the harmfulness or abuse potential of marijuana when used
by adults for any reason.
The legislative history notes that
"misuse of a drug in suicides and attempted suicides,
as well as injuries resulting from unsupervised use are regarded
as indicative of a drug's potential for abuse."(2)
As discussed in section 4, the DAWN data indicates that
rated for each 100,000 people in our population, marijuana
use alone produced less emergency room visits than common
household painkillers such as Advil, Tylenol, and aspirin
or benzodiazepines such as alprazolam (Xanax), diazepam (Valium),
or lorazepam. (The Controlled Substances Act regulates drugs
by classes, so for useful comparisons, DAWN statistics for
marijuana should be compared to other classes of drugs.)
As discussed in section 3 and section 4, marijuana is
a non-toxic drug. Cannabinoid receptors do not affect the
medullary controls of heart and lung activity. It is virtually
impossible to commit suicide with marijuana. The use of marijuana
in suicide attempts is a futile exercise, and is an indication
of ignorance about the substance's effects more so than an
indication of a dangerous abuse potential. Nonetheless, the
DAWN statistics are frequently offered as proof that marijuana
use equals marijuana abuse. Like their hypothesis about marijuana
potency, the DAWN statistics are used by advocates of schedule
I status to give the greater significance to the prevalence
of marijuana use as an index of abuse. Such claims lack a
scientific and medical basis.
Section four above contains comments by the Secretary
of Health and Human Services on data from the Drug Abuse Warning
Network (DAWN) and critiques the Secretary's use of the DAWN
data. A more concise excerpt of Secretary Shalala's comments
are presented below, and are included to support the assertion
that current U.S. government policy is based on the mistaken
assumption that marijuana users are like all other drug users,
and will "eventually' end up in the emergency room begging
for assistance.
"We must act now to ensure that our young people understand
the serious health effects of marijuana and other drugs so
they don't end up like so many of the long-term drug users
in the DAWN survey -- chronically ill, in need of detoxification,
and standing in line in overcrowded hospital emergency rooms.
"This isn't hyperbole.
"There is a large body of research over the past 20 years
that shows that children who use tobacco, alcohol, and particularly
marijuana are at increased risk of using other drugs.
"That's why these increases in marijuana use are of grave
concern.
"The more young people know that all drugs -- including
marijuana -- are harmful, the less likely they are to engage
in the self-destructive behaviors that we see culminating
in the DAWN data."(3)
This section will support the assertion that the connection
between teenage marijuana use and other drug use is social,
not pharmacological, and is not an indication that adult marijuana
use represents a threat to public health by increasing use
of other addictive drugs.
|