|
Executive Summary
Recently released data from two major federal government
reports, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and the
Treatment Episode Data Set, underscore the failure of Bush
Administration drug policies. This failure is further documented
by a brief review of the 2002 Bush Administration National
Drug Control Strategy and related program evaluations from
their Office of Management and Budget.
Main Conclusions
1. The Bush Administration has failed to reduce or control
marijuana use in the United States. Marginal changes in marijuana
and other drug use have been distorted to support false claims
that incremental progress in reducing marijuana and other
drug use has been achieved. Marijuana use is fundamentally
the same as when the Bush Administration took office and illicit
drug use overall has increased. Drug use data do not support
Bush Administration claims that its policies have had a significant
impact on illicit drug use in the United States.
2. Increases in drug treatment admissions for marijuana (often
cited by officials as "proof" of marijuana's dangers)
are driven by criminal justice policies rather than medical
diagnosis. These policies increase public costs for providing
drug treatment services and reduce funds for and availability
of treatment of more serious drug problems.
3. Bush Administration documents acknowledge and document
the failure of their national drug control strategy.
1. Failure to Reduce Marijuana Use
The Bush Administration has failed to reduce or control marijuana
use in the United States. Marginal changes in marijuana and
other drug use have been distorted to support inflated claims
of progress in reducing marijuana and other drug use. Marijuana
use is fundamentally the same as when the Bush Administration
took office, and illicit drug use overall has increased.
• In 2007 there were 14.5 million current users of
marijuana in the United States, compared with 14.6 million
in 2002. From 2002 to 2007 annual use of marijuana declined
slightly from 25.9 to 25.1 million. The number of Americans
who have used marijuana at some point in their lives actually
increased, from 95 million in 2002 to over 100 million in
2007.
• Teenage marijuana use remains a serious problem in
the United States. One in nine (12%) 14- and 15-year-olds
and one in four (23.7%) 16- and 17-year-olds used marijuana
in 2007.
• There were 35.7 million annual illicit drug users
in the United States in 2007, 14.4% of the population. Individuals
who only use marijuana account for 41% of all annual illicit
drug users. While 10.5 million people used marijuana and at
least one other illegal drug (29% of all illicit drug users),
there were 10.6 million people (30%) who used illegal drugs
but did not use marijuana.
• There were 472,000 12- and 13-year-olds and 627,000
14- and 15-year-olds who did not use marijuana in 2006 but
still used illegal drugs. Nearly half of these individuals
used inhalants and illegally obtained pain relief drugs.
2. Diversion of Treatment Resources
Increases in drug treatment admissions for marijuana, often
cited by officials as evidence that marijuana is dangerously
addictive, are driven by criminal justice policies rather
than medical diagnosis. These policies increase public costs
for providing drug treatment services and reduce funds for
and availability of treatment of more serious drug problems.
• The percentage of admissions in which marijuana was
the primary substance of abuse referred by the criminal justice
system increased from 48% in 1992 to 58% in 2006.
• When marijuana was the primary substance of abuse,
just 45% of the admissions met the DSM criteria for marijuana
dependence.
• Almost three-fifths (58%) of all admissions involving
marijuana also involved alcohol, and where marijuana was the
primary substance of abuse alcohol was an additional factor
in 47%.
• Non-intensive outpatient treatment is the most likely
treatment for patients in which marijuana is the primary substance
of abuse, accounting for 68% of these admissions. Use of residential
detox -- a clear sign of a serious addiction problem -- is
used for 24% of heroin admissions and 21% of alcohol admissions,
but just 2% of marijuana admissions.
• Government programs will pay for the treatment of
62% of admissions where marijuana is the primary substance
of abuse, and 60% of the admissions referred by the criminal
justice system. In thousands of cases, taxpayers appear to
be funding treatment for non-addicts whose only problem is
that they got caught with marijuana.
3. Failure of National Drug Control Strategy
The 2002 National Drug Control Strategy of the Bush Administration
laid out the following objectives:
Two-Year Goals:
• A 10 percent reduction in current use of illegal
drugs by the 12-17 age group
• A 10 percent reduction in current use of illegal
drugs by adults age 18 and older
Five-Year Goals:
• A 25 percent reduction in current use of illegal
drugs by the 12-17 age group
• A 25 percent reduction in current use of illegal
drugs by adults age 18 and older
Progress toward all goals will be measured from the baseline
established by the 2000 National Household Survey on Drug
Abuse. All Strategy goals seek to reduce "current"
use of "any illicit drug," as defined by the Household
Survey. [pg 3]
The recent release of the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use
and Health (the revised successor of the National Household
Survey) provides data with which to evaluate these goals.
Among the 12-to-17 age group there was a 7% population reduction
in current illegal drug use from 2002 to 2004, and a 16% reduction
from 2002 to 2007. Among adults age 18 or older, though, the
population of current illegal drug users fell 1.5% from 2002
to 2004 and increased 4.8% from 2002 to 2007. The increase
in adult use of illicit drugs was due to the use of opioid
pain relievers.
The Office of Management and Budget provides evaluations
for Administration programs by way of the ExpectMore.gov Web
site. Here are the evaluations for the demand reduction components
of the Bush Administration's 2002 National Drug Control Strategy:
• Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program: Results Not
Demonstrated
• Drug-Free Communities Program: Adequate
• National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: Results
Not Demonstrated
• Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant:
Ineffective
• Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program: Results
Not Demonstrated
• Drug Courts Program: Results Not Demonstrated
Furthermore, according to OMB, the Drug Enforcement Administration
has been ineffective at curbing the availability of illegal
drugs:
The Drug Enforcement Administration is unable to demonstrate
its impact on the availability of drugs in the US but has
shown sustained progress in disrupting and dismantling high
priority drug trafficking organizations. The program consistently
exceeds its performance targets for disrupting and dismantling
these priority trafficking groups.
Table of Contents
Consistent, Persistent, and Resistant: Marijuana
Use in the United States
by Jon Gettman
Executive
Summary
Full
Report (PDF)
Marijuana Drug Treatment Episodes
by Jon Gettman
Executive
Summary
Full
Report (PDF)
|